avatar
legalpdf
legalpdf's Blog
Legal PDF: Tech Court Cases
legalpdf
legalpdf's Blog
Legal PDF: Tech Court Cases

COPA Sues Craig Wright for Pretending to be Bitcoin founder, Satoshi Nakamoto

cover
23 Jul 2024

COPA v. Wright, Court Filing, retrieved on January 29, 2024, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part of this filing here. This is the table of links with all parts.

Case Number: IL-2021-000019 and IL-2022-000069

Plaintiffs: Crypto Open Patent Alliance

Defendant: Dr. Craig Steven Wright

Filing Date: January 29, 2024

Location: High Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts of England & Wales, Intellectual Property list (ChD)

Table of Content

INTRODUCTION

(i) Overall Conclusions

(ii) Organisation of this Appendix

  1. An illustration of the intricacies and depths of Dr Wright’s forgeries

  2. The BDO Image ‘Time Capsule’ “BDOPC.raw”

    (a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery

    (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility

    (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal

    (d) Conclusion

  3. The LATEX files: Main.tex and E-Cash-main.tex

    (i) Dr Wright’s main LaTeX file “main.tex”, “Candidate L” {H/340/1}

    (ii) Dr Wright’s “electronic cash” LaTeX file “E-Cash-main.tex”, “Candidate C” {H/331/1}

  4. The BlackNet Abstract (Particulars of Claim at [26]-[27] {A/2/9}) The Second Pleaded Example C00000917

    (a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery

    (b) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal

    Conclusion

  5. “Project BlackNet” paper (Reliance Document) {ID_001379} / {L1/79/1}

    (a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery

    (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility

    (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal

    (d) Conclusion

  6. Statistics Assessment homework {ID_000073} / {L1/323/1}

    (a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery

    (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility

    (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal

    Conclusion

  7. Conversions to LaTeX using the 2022 version of Pandoc {ID_004648} {PTR-F/5/1} and {ID_004687} {L1/236/1}"

    (a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery

    (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility

    (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal

    (d) Conclusion

  8. LLM Dissertation proposal 2 (Reliance Document) {ID_000217} / {L2/131/1}

    (a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery

    (b) Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility

    (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal

    (d) Conclusion

  9. Handwritten BDO Minutes (Reliance Document) {ID_004013} / {L2/159/1}

    (a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery

    (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility

    (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal

    (d) Conclusions

  10. “A Competing Transaction or Block Model” {ID_004682} {L1/367/1}

    (a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery

    (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility

    (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal

    (d) Conclusion

  11. “The King2.rtf” {ID_004695} {L2/49/1}

    (a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery

    (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility

    (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal

  12. False LLM Proposal “Proposala.rtf” {ID_004697} {L2/54}

    (a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery

    (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility

    (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal

    (d) Conclusion

  13. “Hash Based Shadowing” (Scanned Manuscript Document) {ID_004729} {PTRF/86/1}

    (a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery

    (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility

    (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal

  14. Variations on “Secure and Trustworthy Voting” {ID_004732} {PTR-F/89/1} and {ID_004734} {PTR-F/91/1}

    (a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery

    (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility

    (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal

  15. “Internal Controls…Backend Operations” {ID_004733} {PTR-F/90/1}

    (a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery

    (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility

    (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal

  16. “NG3.tex” and related files {ID_004715} {PTR-F/72/1}, {ID_004716} {PTR-F/73/1}, {ID_004719} {PTR-F/76/1}

    (a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery

    (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility

    (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal

  17. “LPA.tex” and “LP1.tex” {ID_004722} {PTR-F/79/1} and {ID_004723} {PTRF/80/1}

    (a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery

    (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility

    (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal

  18. “ESDT.tex” {ID_004736} {PTR-F/93/1}

    (a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery

    (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility

    (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal

  19. Tominaka Nakamoto: Monumenta Nipponica {ID_004019} / {L2/245/1}

    (a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery

    (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility

    (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal

    (d) Conclusion

  20. Backdated White Paper PDF (1) {ID_000536} / {L2/474/1}

    (a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery

    (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility

    (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal

    (d) Conclusion

  21. OpenOffice 2.4 document (Reliance Document) {ID_000260} / {L2/294/1}

    (a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery

    (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility

    (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal

    (d) Conclusion

  22. The 12 March 2008 Kleiman emails

    (a) (Particulars of Claim at [28] – [29] {A/2/10}) The Third Pleaded Example ID_001318

    (b) COPA’s reason for alleging forgery.

    (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations

  23. Email: “I need your help editing a paper I am going to release” (1) {ID_000465}

    (a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery

    (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility

    (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal

    (d) Conclusions

  24. Timecoin ODT Whitepaper (Reliance Document) {ID_000254}

    (a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery

    (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility

    (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal

    (d) Conclusion

  25. “Block diffusion within bitcoin” (Reliance Document) {ID_000367} / {L3/185/1}

    (a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery

    (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility

    (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal

    (d) Conclusion

  26. The SSRN Submission (Particulars of Claim at [30]-[35] {A/2/10}) The Fourth Pleaded Example

    (a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery

    (b) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal

    (c) Conclusion

  27. False NAB Account Records {ID_003455} / {L15/100/1}

    (a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery

    (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility

    (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal

    (d) Conclusion

  28. Economics of BitCoin Nodes (Reliance Document) {ID_000227} / {L3/219/1}

    (a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery

    (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility

    (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal

    (d) Conclusion

  29. “Noncooperative finite games” (Reliance Document) {ID_000396} / {L3/203/1}

    (a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery

    (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility

    (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal

    (d) Conclusion

  30. Coffee-stained printout of Bitcoin White Paper (Reliance Document) {ID_004011} / {L2/234/1}

    (a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery

    (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility

    (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal

    (d) Conclusion

  31. “Economic Security.doc” (Reliance Document) {ID_000258} / {L3/286/1}

    (a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery

    (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility

    (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal

    (d) Conclusion

  32. “BitCoin: SEIR-C Propagation models of block and transaction dissemination” (Reliance Document) {ID_000550} / {L3/237/1}

    (a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery

    (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility

    (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal

    (d) Conclusion

  33. C++ Code {ID_004712} {PTR-F/69/1} and {ID_004713} {PTR-F/70/1}

    (a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery

    (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility

    (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal

    (d) Conclusion

  34. Converted Code2Flow source code flowchart (Reliance Document) {ID_000554} / {L3/326/1}

    (a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery

    (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility

    (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal

    (d) Conclusion

  35. bitcoin.exe - hex-edited{ID_000739} / {L3/474/1}

    (a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery

    (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility

    (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal

    (d) Conclusion

  36. MYOB accounting screenshots (Reliance Documents) {ID_004077} / {L5/150/1}, plus ID_004078 and ID_004079.

    (a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery

    (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility

    (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal

    Conclusion

  37. The Tulip Trust Deed (Particulars of Claim at [66A] {A/2/10}) ({ID_001186}) / {L8/20/1}) The Fifth Pleaded Example

    (a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery

    (b) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal

    (c) Conclusions

  38. Spoofed email from Dr Wright in the name of Satoshi Nakamoto (1) {ID_001546} / {L8/338/1}

    (a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery

    (b) COPA’s Reasons for Inferring Dr Wright’s Knowledge / Responsibility

    (c) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal(d)

    Conclusion

  39. The Sartre Message (Particulars of Claim at [23]-[25] {A/2/8}) The First Pleaded Example

    (a) COPA’s Reasons for Alleging Forgery

    (b) Dr Wright’s Explanations and COPA’s Rebuttal

    (c) Conclusion

  40. The MYOB Ontier email (aka ‘the Ramona Version’) dated 18 February 2024.

    (a) Background

    (b) The email

    (c) COPA’s Allegation

    (d) Dr Wright’s contention

    (e) The timestamps and other points raised by Dr Wright.

    (f) Conclusion

About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.

This court case retrieved on January 29, 2024, judiciary.uk is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.

← Previous

Record Labels Demand Jury Trial in Verizon Copyright Infringement Case
Up Next →

Court Rules Craig Wright Definitely Isn't Satoshi Nakamoto